Alex C. Michalos: Popper-Carnap Controversy by Alex C. Michalos - gebruikt boek
ISBN: 9789024751273
1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probabilit… Meer...
1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention. Media > Book<
BetterWorldBooks.com
used in stock. Verzendingskosten:zzgl. Versandkosten., exclusief verzendingskosten Details...
(*) Uitverkocht betekent dat het boek is momenteel niet beschikbaar op elk van de bijbehorende platforms we zoeken.
1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probabilit… Meer...
1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention., Springer<
Springer.com
Nr. 978-90-247-5127-3. Verzendingskosten:Worldwide free shipping, , DE. (EUR 0.00) Details...
(*) Uitverkocht betekent dat het boek is momenteel niet beschikbaar op elk van de bijbehorende platforms we zoeken.
Alex C. Michalos: The Popper-Carnap Controversy - pocketboek
1971, ISBN: 9024751276
[EAN: 9789024751273], Neubuch, [PU: Springer Netherlands], WISSENSCHAFTSPHILOSOPHIE KARLR.POPPER RUDOLFCARNAP GROWTH PROBABILITY SINGULAR PHILOSOPHIE ALLGEMEINES LEXIKA KARL R. POPPER RUD… Meer...
[EAN: 9789024751273], Neubuch, [PU: Springer Netherlands], WISSENSCHAFTSPHILOSOPHIE KARLR.POPPER RUDOLFCARNAP GROWTH PROBABILITY SINGULAR PHILOSOPHIE ALLGEMEINES LEXIKA KARL R. POPPER RUDOLF CARNAP WISSENSCHAFTSPHILOSOPHIEÂ UND -THEORIE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PHILOSOPHY, GENERAL, Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. 1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keyn., Books<
Popper-Carnap Controversy by Alex C. Michalos - gebruikt boek
ISBN: 9789024751273
1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probabilit… Meer...
1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention. Media > Book<
used in stock. Verzendingskosten:zzgl. Versandkosten., exclusief verzendingskosten
1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probabilit… Meer...
1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention., Springer<
Nr. 978-90-247-5127-3. Verzendingskosten:Worldwide free shipping, , DE. (EUR 0.00)
Alex C. Michalos: The Popper-Carnap Controversy - pocketboek
1971
ISBN: 9024751276
[EAN: 9789024751273], Neubuch, [PU: Springer Netherlands], WISSENSCHAFTSPHILOSOPHIE KARLR.POPPER RUDOLFCARNAP GROWTH PROBABILITY SINGULAR PHILOSOPHIE ALLGEMEINES LEXIKA KARL R. POPPER RUD… Meer...
[EAN: 9789024751273], Neubuch, [PU: Springer Netherlands], WISSENSCHAFTSPHILOSOPHIE KARLR.POPPER RUDOLFCARNAP GROWTH PROBABILITY SINGULAR PHILOSOPHIE ALLGEMEINES LEXIKA KARL R. POPPER RUDOLF CARNAP WISSENSCHAFTSPHILOSOPHIEÂ UND -THEORIE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE PHILOSOPHY, GENERAL, Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. 1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keyn., Books<
1Aangezien sommige platformen geen verzendingsvoorwaarden meedelen en deze kunnen afhangen van het land van levering, de aankoopprijs, het gewicht en de grootte van het artikel, een eventueel lidmaatschap van het platform, een rechtstreekse levering door het platform of via een derde aanbieder (Marktplaats), enz., is het mogelijk dat de door euro-boek.nl meegedeelde verzendingskosten niet overeenstemmen met deze van het aanbiedende platform.
Bibliografische gegevens van het best passende boek
1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper's intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap's theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap's theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and I hope improved account of that investigation appears in the first five chapters of this book. Put very briefly, what I found were four main points of contention.
Gedetalleerde informatie over het boek. - The Popper-Carnap Controversy
EAN (ISBN-13): 9789024751273 ISBN (ISBN-10): 9024751276 pocket book Verschijningsjaar: 1971 Uitgever: Springer 138 Bladzijden Gewicht: 0,221 kg Taal: eng/Englisch
Boek bevindt zich in het datenbestand sinds 2007-04-29T21:15:50+02:00 (Amsterdam) Boek voor het laatst gevonden op 2024-06-07T13:25:48+02:00 (Amsterdam) ISBN/EAN: 9024751276
ISBN - alternatieve schrijfwijzen: 90-247-5127-6, 978-90-247-5127-3 alternatieve schrijfwijzen en verwante zoekwoorden: Auteur van het boek: michalos alex, carnapp, karl popper, carnap rudolf, karl springer Titel van het boek: the popper carnap controversy
Gegevens van de uitgever
Auteur: Alex C. Michalos Titel: The Popper-Carnap Controversy Uitgeverij: Springer; Springer Netherland 124 Bladzijden Verschijningsjaar: 1971-07-31 Dordrecht; NL Taal: Engels 53,49 € (DE) 54,99 € (AT) 59,00 CHF (CH) Available XI, 124 p.
BC; Hardcover, Softcover / Philosophie/Allgemeines, Lexika; Wissenschaftsphilosophie und -theorie; Verstehen; Karl R. Popper; Rudolf Carnap; growth; probability; singular; Philosophy of Science; Philosophy; Philosophie; EA
I: Introduction.- II: Acceptability and Logical Improbability.- III: Two Explicanda and Three Arguments.- IV: Bar-Hillel’s “Comments” and Unrestricted Universals.- V: Instance and Qualified-Instance Confirmation.- VI: The Singular Predictive Inference.- VII: Lakatos on Appraisal, Growth and Analytic Guides.- VIII: Hintikka and Hilpinen on Inductive Generalzation.- IX: Cost-Benefit Versus Expected Utility Acceptance Rules.- List of Reference.
Andere boeken die eventueel grote overeenkomsten met dit boek kunnen hebben:
