2012, ISBN: 9781154281231

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustra… Meer...

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1919 Excerpt: ...have definite cases of black chaff been found even in districts where the disease caused from 50 to 90% reduction last year. Occasional leaf lesions have been seen, however, which may have been caused by the black chaff organism. Nebraska: (Results of Cereal Disease Survey, June 27-July 3) Found in 3l out of 67 fields inspected in amounts varying from very slight to severe. North Dakota: (Bolley, July l5.) Disease not present in destructive form. Only traces have been apparent in fields examined. Ohio: (Results of Cereal Disease Survey, June l2-July 3.) Reported from 2 of the 283 fields inspected in slight and moderate amounts. Both cases were found in Darke County. Tennessee: (Results of Cereal Disease Survey, May 30-June 7.) Found in 3 of the I77 fields inspected in slight amounts. Glume and leaf spotH caused by Septoria spp. Illinois: (Results of Cereal Disease Survey, June l8-28.) Three slight infections and one of l0% reported. Missouri: (Results of Cereal Disease Survey, May 3l-June 27.) Present in amounts from very slight to very abundant in 200,of the 562 fields inspected. Ohio: (Results of Cereal Disease Survey, June l2-July 3) Found in ll6 out of the 283 fields inspected in amounts ranging from very slight to severe. Pennsylvania: Found in 32 out of the l0$ fields inspected (slight and severe). Tennessee: (Results of Cereal Disease Survey, May 30-June 7.) Found in l08 out of the I77 fields inspected (very slight to severe). North Dakota: (Bolley, July l5.) This root and seedling trouble has been very destructive throughout the year and generally throughout the state in fields and regions of rather constant cropping and destructiveness in many cases depends largely on the condition of the seed sowed. It is perhaps the most destructive excepting sca... Weight:0.34 lbs, RareBooksClub.com, 5/14/2012 0:00:00, This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1910 Excerpt: ... for which he shall have served one year in any prison in this State or in any other State in the United States, shall be convicted for a third time he shall be imprisoned for a maximum of thirty years. The habitual criminal stands before the court in a different position from the man who is charged with a single offense. There is not the same chance that the penalty of the offence will by its severity stay the court or the jury in connection with the conviction. As a matter of fact, shortly after the act took effect a man was indicted in Philadelphia as an habitual criminal and was convic'ted and sentenced under the statute. In the first case under the act, Commonwealth vs. Hill, the constitutionality of the act is questioned. It is alleged that the act is not properly drawn and that its provisions.are not properly mentioned in its title. The courts have had the case in their hands for two months and have not yet handed down an opinion. While the act seems to deal severely with the habitual criminal, it deals most leniently with the first offender. It gives him an opportunity for reformation. Where his offence is not one which shocks the social order and indicates a malicious spirit, his sentence is suspended and he is released under parole. That parole is conditional, and the court may impose such conditions as it thinks best. It may provide that he shall make regular report, and shall keep away from saloons. An adequate probation sees to it that he has employment. It may provide that he shall account for the way he spends his money. The effectiveness of the probation measures the success of the act. If the probation system the act provides does not act as a sufficient deterrent for crime, you must blame the administration of the law and not necessarily t... Weight:0.27 lbs, RareBooksClub.com, 5/11/2012 0:00:00, Nabu Press, 1/11/2010 0:00:00, This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1920. Excerpt: ... scribed certain regulations for him to carry out, so that he will have something with which to back himself up. Probably the best th'ng to do is pass an ordinance or resolution prescribing certain regulations and a reasonable license fee, see that notice is given to everybody concerned, and then have your police officer enforce it. If he enforces it in one or two cases he will have no further trouble. If there is anything further on this, let us hear from you again. Q. 30. As to paving and assessing on state highways? A. The statement of appropriation in Section 4 is all right as it stands or it may be changed in the manner you suggest; either one will do as the appropriation is only made out of funds applicable to the purpose and would not touch sinking funds. We see no objection to the other clause m Sect:on 2 staling that the assessments are laid and appropriated for the payment of the work. Your authority for doing the work and levying the assessment in under Jie Act approved May 14, 1915, P. L. 312, and as amended by the Act of June 5, 1919. P. L. 401, being Paragraph 7 of Section 9 of said act. We think it advisable to not distinguish between different sections of the street, but to assess against 1he whole street. The ordinance should state that two-thirds of the cost be assessed upon the abutters according with the foot front plan. We suggest an ordinance somewhat as follows: An Ordinance No An Ordinance providing for the paving of in the Borough of and providing for the assessment of uwo-thirds of the cost thereof against abutting property owners. Whereas etc. (here we would insert the general statement that the state and county are build;ng a central roadway and that it is the desire of the borough to extend the width of pavement, setting forth ... Weight:0.44 lbs, General Books LLC, 2/1/2012 0:00:00, This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1912. Excerpt: ... PAGE Shaw v. Long et al 319 Shaw & Co. v. Fitzpatrick 358 Shedd et al. v. Cooke 364 Sheet & Tin Plate Co., Otitia v 1 357 Simpson, The Ohio & Pennsylvania Coal Co. v 310 Sims et al., Mitchell et al. v 361 Skinner Bending Co. v. Jensen, Guardian 322 Small, The Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v 334.Harmon, Receiver, v 334 Smart, Treasurer, v. Delaware County Agricultural Society 329 Smith et al. v. Matthew et al 357 v. The Ohio Traction Co 351, The State of Ohio v 324 Snider Lumber Co., Hurley, by etc., v 344 Sorg et al. v. Fetzer et al 314 Southwell, The Toledo, Fostoria & Findlay Electric Railway Co. v 342 Spieth, Noonan v 363 Stanley, Crothers et al. v 338 Starch Co., Gruner v 336 State of Ohio v. Campbell 335, Curtis v 326, Diegle v 310, Ferguson v 356, Grossner v 312, 318 v. Hensel 325, Hinz v 348, Johnson v 325 v. Lynch 348, Selvaggio v 366 v. Smith 324 State, ex rel. Binyon, a Taxpayer, v. Fisher et al 328 The Bucyrus Light & Power Co., v. The Public Service Commission of Ohio et al 320 Ellis, Attorney General, v. The Miami & Erie Canal Transportation Co. et al 321 Elson, Mowery, Auditor, v 327 Manufacturers' Appraisal Co., v. Sayre, Auditor..362 Rulison, Pros. Atty., v. The First National Bank of Cincinnati 306 Rulison, Pros. Atty., v. The Western German Bank 305 Stilwell, Lewis, Treasurer, v 329 Stewart, The German Fire Insurance Co. v 352 Stilwell (The State, ex rel.), Lewis, Treasurer, v 329 PAGE Stoepel & Co. v. Craven 313 Stone, Receiver, v. The Cincinnati, Dayton & Toledo Traction Co. et al 339 Storts et al.. Trustees, v. Scott 332 Studevant v. Roth 340 Sullivan, Poland v 318 Surety Co., Burk v 312 Swearingen, Admr., v. Hoopengarner et al 326 v. Mushrush 332 Swetland & Sons Co. v. The Bronx Realty Co 313 Taylor, Daniels v 307, a Taxp... Weight:0.5 lbs, General Books LLC, 2/5/2012 0:00:00<

2012, ISBN: 9781154281231

Nabu Press, 1/11/2010 0:00:00, This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publi… Meer...

Nabu Press, 1/11/2010 0:00:00, This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1912. Excerpt: ... PAGE Shaw v. Long et al 319 Shaw & Co. v. Fitzpatrick 358 Shedd et al. v. Cooke 364 Sheet & Tin Plate Co., Otitia v 1 357 Simpson, The Ohio & Pennsylvania Coal Co. v 310 Sims et al., Mitchell et al. v 361 Skinner Bending Co. v. Jensen, Guardian 322 Small, The Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v 334.Harmon, Receiver, v 334 Smart, Treasurer, v. Delaware County Agricultural Society 329 Smith et al. v. Matthew et al 357 v. The Ohio Traction Co 351, The State of Ohio v 324 Snider Lumber Co., Hurley, by etc., v 344 Sorg et al. v. Fetzer et al 314 Southwell, The Toledo, Fostoria & Findlay Electric Railway Co. v 342 Spieth, Noonan v 363 Stanley, Crothers et al. v 338 Starch Co., Gruner v 336 State of Ohio v. Campbell 335, Curtis v 326, Diegle v 310, Ferguson v 356, Grossner v 312, 318 v. Hensel 325, Hinz v 348, Johnson v 325 v. Lynch 348, Selvaggio v 366 v. Smith 324 State, ex rel. Binyon, a Taxpayer, v. Fisher et al 328 The Bucyrus Light & Power Co., v. The Public Service Commission of Ohio et al 320 Ellis, Attorney General, v. The Miami & Erie Canal Transportation Co. et al 321 Elson, Mowery, Auditor, v 327 Manufacturers' Appraisal Co., v. Sayre, Auditor..362 Rulison, Pros. Atty., v. The First National Bank of Cincinnati 306 Rulison, Pros. Atty., v. The Western German Bank 305 Stilwell, Lewis, Treasurer, v 329 Stewart, The German Fire Insurance Co. v 352 Stilwell (The State, ex rel.), Lewis, Treasurer, v 329 PAGE Stoepel & Co. v. Craven 313 Stone, Receiver, v. The Cincinnati, Dayton & Toledo Traction Co. et al 339 Storts et al.. Trustees, v. Scott 332 Studevant v. Roth 340 Sullivan, Poland v 318 Surety Co., Burk v 312 Swearingen, Admr., v. Hoopengarner et al 326 v. Mushrush 332 Swetland & Sons Co. v. The Bronx Realty Co 313 Taylor, Daniels v 307, a Taxp... Weight:0.5 lbs, General Books LLC, 2/5/2012 0:00:00<