ISBN: 1231983108

[EAN: 9781231983102], Neubuch, BOOKS GROUP,SUBJECTS, This item is printed on demand. Paperback. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free… Meer...

[EAN: 9781231983102], Neubuch, BOOKS GROUP,SUBJECTS, This item is printed on demand. Paperback. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1868 Excerpt: . . . so far as may be inconsistent with this Act. A suppliant may petition in respect of certain alleged claims against the-Crown; as in this case the claim is two-fold--against the Crown as a common carrier, and also as a gratuitous bailee; and the Crown may have no objection to those claims being tried. But, if this suppliant had stated also in his petition, that the Crown was also liable as a carrier for hire, the Crown might have said that they would not allow that question to be entertained. The petition and declaration must be considered as one document. HARGRAVES, J. I concur. The petition is identified-by the earlier sections of the Act as a particular petition in connection with the Governors fiat. The words such other relief as the Court may think fit, in the 9th section, mean such other relief as might be given according to the practice in Equity. If a party chooses to bring an action without due consideration, he must bear the consequences. The statute is beneficial to the subject, whose duty it is to consider the nature of 1367- the evidence in support of his claim before bringing the O The action. RIENTAL C0Rl: ;: lnN CHEEKE, J. , concurred. I I. Th Application dismissed. B UEEN. STEPHEN, C. J. , said, if the Court could grant costs, this was a case in which they would not grant them, as it was clear that, as between subject and subject, the amendment would have been allowed. J 16. . i sepfiiber 5 Hocm agamst CURTIS (a). fo1;6B): , gl: ; THE declaration was for money had and received, money had and on accounts stated. and received, 1 T h . . the defendant P ea. hat t e money s in the declaration alleged to have been had and received by the defendant to t. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.<

2012, ISBN: 1231983108

[EAN: 9781231983102], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers … Meer...

[EAN: 9781231983102], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1868 Excerpt: .so far as may be inconsistent with this Act. A suppliant may petition in respect of certain alleged claims against the-Crown; as in this case the claim is two-fold--against the Crown as a common carrier, and also as a gratuitous bailee; and the Crown may have no objection to those claims being tried. But, if this suppliant had stated also in his petition, that the Crown was also liable as a carrier for hire, the Crown might have said that they would not allow that question to be entertained. The petition and declaration must be considered as one document. HARGRAVES, J. I concur. The petition is identified-by the earlier sections of the Act as a particular petition in connection with the Governor s fiat. The words such other relief as the Court may think fit, in the 9th section, mean such other relief as might be given according to the practice in Equity. If a party chooses to bring an action without due consideration, he must bear the consequences. The statute is beneficial to the subject, whose duty it is to consider the nature of 1367- the evidence in support of his claim before bringing the O The action. RIENTAL C0Rl: : l nN CHEEKE, J., concurred. I I. Th Application dismissed. B UEEN. STEPHEN, C. J., said, if the Court could grant costs, this was a case in which they would not grant them, as it was clear that, as between subject and subject, the amendment would have been allowed. J 16. i sepfiiber 5 Hocm agamst CURTIS (a). fo 1; 6 B ): , gl THE declaration was for money had and received, money had and on accounts stated. and received, 1 T h . the defendant P ea. hat t e money s in the declaration alleged to have been had and received by the defendant to t.<

2012, ISBN: 1231983108

[EAN: 9781231983102], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers c… Meer...

[EAN: 9781231983102], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1868 Excerpt: .so far as may be inconsistent with this Act. A suppliant may petition in respect of certain alleged claims against the-Crown; as in this case the claim is two-fold--against the Crown as a common carrier, and also as a gratuitous bailee; and the Crown may have no objection to those claims being tried. But, if this suppliant had stated also in his petition, that the Crown was also liable as a carrier for hire, the Crown might have said that they would not allow that question to be entertained. The petition and declaration must be considered as one document. HARGRAVES, J. I concur. The petition is identified-by the earlier sections of the Act as a particular petition in connection with the Governor s fiat. The words such other relief as the Court may think fit, in the 9th section, mean such other relief as might be given according to the practice in Equity. If a party chooses to bring an action without due consideration, he must bear the consequences. The statute is beneficial to the subject, whose duty it is to consider the nature of 1367- the evidence in support of his claim before bringing the O The action. RIENTAL C0Rl: : l nN CHEEKE, J., concurred. I I. Th Application dismissed. B UEEN. STEPHEN, C. J., said, if the Court could grant costs, this was a case in which they would not grant them, as it was clear that, as between subject and subject, the amendment would have been allowed. J 16. i sepfiiber 5 Hocm agamst CURTIS (a). fo 1; 6 B ): , gl THE declaration was for money had and received, money had and on accounts stated. and received, 1 T h . the defendant P ea. hat t e money s in the declaration alleged to have been had and received by the defendant to t.<